Pandi Sambrajyam Vs Kokkera Yellaiah (Died) — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Pandi Sambrajyam Vs Kokkera Yellaiah (Died) — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; court fee paid on the Second Appeal to be refunded to the appellant; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.

Ratio / Principle

This Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, following the appellant's counsel reporting that the matter had been settled out of Court and the filing of Memo U.S.R.No.11922 of 2026 for withdrawal of the appeal itself.

Key takeaways

Since the Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, the court fee paid on the Second Appeal is to be refunded to the appellant.ratio¶31
There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶32
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶33

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Second Appeal No.803 of 2025, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction), decided 06.02.2026 by Justice R. Raghunandan Rao. Appellant: Pandi Sambrajyam; Respondents: Kokkera Yellaiah (died) and Pandi Venkayamma (LR); counsel for appellant Neela Manjari J S; none listed for respondents. The appeal challenged the Decree and Judgment dated 28.04.2025 in A.S.No.178 of 2019 of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial of offences against women, Guntur, which had confirmed the Decree and Judgment dated 22.04.2016 in O.S.No.308 of 2011 of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, Guntur District. An interlocutory application (IA No.1 of 2025) under Section 151 CPC had sought stay of further proceedings pursuant to the 28.04.2025 judgment. At hearing, counsel for the appellant submitted the matter had been settled out of Court and a Memo bearing U.S.R.No.11922 of 2026 was filed for withdrawal of the appeal; accordingly the Second Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, the court fee paid on it ordered refunded to the appellant, no order as to costs made, and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stood closed. No substantive issue was adjudicated; the judgment carries no precedential content.

APHC010520522025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3206]

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 803/2025

Between:

PANDI SAMBRAJYAM, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O 26-16-146, 2ND LANE, AKULAVARITHOTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT

AND

KOKKERA YELLAIAH DIED, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/O. KORRAPADU VILLAGE MEDIKONDURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

PANDI VENKAYAMMA LR, W/O VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O GUNDLAPALLI VILLAGE, NAKARIKALLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal under section ___________ against orderspleased to set- aside the Decree and Judgment, dt.28.04.2025 in A.S.No.178 of 2019 on the file of the court of v addl. district and sessions judge-cum-spl. judge for trial of offences against women, Guntur, confirming the Decree and Judgment, dt. 22.04.2016 in O.S.No.308 of 2011, on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, Guntur District, and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to Stay of all and further proceedings of Decree and Judgment,

2

RRR,J S.A.No.803 of 2025

dt.28.04.2025 in A.S.No.178 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the V Additional District Sessions Judge, Guntur, confirming the Decree and Judgment, dt.22.04.2016 in O.S.No.308 of 2011, on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, Guntur District, pending disposal of the. Second Appeal and pass

Counsel for the Appellant:

1.NEELA MANJARI J S

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

3

RRR,J S.A.No.803 of 2025

The Court made the following Judgment:

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that, the matter has been settled out of the Court, and no further orders are required in the present Second Appeal.

A Memo bearing U.S.R.No.11922 of 2026, has also been filed for withdrawal of the Second Appeal itself.

Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

As the Second Appeal has been dismissed as withdrawn, the Court fee

paid on the Second Appeal to be refunded to the appellant.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

closed.

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

________________________

Date:06.02.2026 KPV

4

RRR,J S.A.No.803 of 2025

115

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

SECOND APPEAL No:803 of 2025

06.02.2026

KPV

5

RRR,J S.A.No.803 of 2025