Kakarlapudi Satyanarayana Raju Vs Madduri… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

Kakarlapudi Satyanarayana Raju Vs Madduri… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

[3329]

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :02.07.2026 Date of uploading :

APHC010297282017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 2^nd DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3836/2017

Between:

KAKARLAPUDI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O.LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.3-57/2, SURANNA NAGAR, VAKALAPUDI, KRISHNA - 533 005.

KAKARLAPUDI VENKATA SUBBA RAJU, S/O.LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.70-14-11/A, JAYENDRA NAGAR, KAKINADA - 533 003.

VATSAVAYI VENKATA TIRUPATHI RAJU, S/O.CHINNA VENKATA NARASIMHARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.D.NO.2-495/13, ROAD NO.1, AISHWARYA NAGAR, KAKINADA RURAL - 533 006.

VATSAVAYI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA VARMA, S/O.SURYANARAYANARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.H.NO.18-121, MADHURAWADA, PORT COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 035.

JAMPANA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O.VENKATAPATHI RAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.D.NO.68/5/2, DOWN STAIRS, GEETAM SCHOOL, OPPOSITE STREET, ASHOK NAGAR, NEAR VEERKAMAL THEATRE, KAKINADA.

MANTHENA RAKESH, S/O.SURYANARAYANA RAJU R/O.F.NO.301, BLOCK-B, SRI SAI NILAYAM, BALAJI HILLS COLONY, NIZAMPET, HYDERABAD - 500 090.

KAKARLAPUDI ADI NARAYANARAJU, S/O.SATYANARAYANARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.KOLAANKA, KAJULURU MANDAL, EAST

2

GODAVARI DISTRICT.

VATSAVAYI SUBHARAYYAMMA, S/O.VEERABHADRARAJU, OCC: HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.2-495/13, ROAD NO.1, AISHWARYA NAGAR, KAKINADA RURAL - 533 006.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

MADDURI VENKATARATNAM SINCE DEAD BY LRS, 1.MADDURI VENKATARAMAN S/O.LATE VENKATARATHNAM, HINDU, AGED 60 YEARS R/O.D.NO.8-4-21, ASHOK NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

MADDURI SRI KRISHNA PARAMATMA, S/O.LATE VENKATATHNAM, HINDU R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA.

AKULA ADILAKSHMI DIED, -

MADDURI TALLEMMA, W/O.LATE VENKATATHNAM, HINDU R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA.

SOMESETTI MADHAVI, W/O.KOTESWARA RA, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA.

KUPPALA SURYAKUMARI, W/O.KANAKAESWARA RAO, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA.

KOLA MEENAKSHI, W/O.VENKATARAMANA, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA.

AKULA SAYANARAYANA, S/O.NOT KNOWN R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI J.C.J.C.

AKULA BHASKARA RAO, S/O.NOT KNOWN R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI J.C.J.C.

AKULA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.SATYANARAYANA R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI

3

J.C.J.C.

AKULA NARAYANA, S/O.SATYANARAYANA R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI J.C.J.C.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toCRP against the order dated 22.12.2016 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada passed in IA No.1155/2008 in OS No.30/1987

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 5050 OF 2017

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 98 days in representation of the above CRP

IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRPMP 5051 OF 2017

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite the hearing in the above CRP

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.VENKAT CHALLA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.V VINOD K REDDY

2.E V V S RAVI KUMAR

The Court made the following:

4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3836 of 2017

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the docket order reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last occasion i.e., on 24.06.2026. Therefore, on 24.06.2026, the matter is directed to be listed on 02.07.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Revision Petition shall stand closed.

_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J

02.07.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No

Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

5

05

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:3836/2017

02.07.2026 BSP/TPS