The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous after learning that the underlying suit had been disposed of by the trial court. No costs were ordered and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3330]
APHC010253542026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1930/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside Order dated 02.01.2026 passed in I.A.No.966 of 2025 in O.S.No.10 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Judge,
2
Kadapa, consequently allow the said IA.No.966 of 2025, as prayed for, and to pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.10 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa, pending final disposal of the main Civil Revision Petition, and to pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1930 OF 2026
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequent to filing of the Civil Revision Petition, suit was disposed of by the learned trial Court and nothing survives in this case to adjudicate further.
In view of the said submission, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall
stand closed.
JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Date: 17.09.2026
KBN
4
58
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1930 of 2026
Date: 17.09.2026
KBN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition survives when the underlying suit has been disposed of by the trial court?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Assistant Executive Engineer, APSPDCL, Porumamilla, YSR Kadapa District
The Superintendent of Engineer (Operations), APSPDCL, Kadapa
The Chief Managing Director, APSPDCL, Tirupati
Kammanethi Bala Obulesu, S/o. Balaraju, aged about 35 years, Rio. Venkatapuram Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District
Nagipogu Harinadh Hari, Lineman, APSPDCL, Porumamilla, YSR Kadapa District
Katherpalli Naga Subba Reddy, S/o. Late K. Ramireddy, aged 46 years, presently working as Lineman, Operations, Badvel Town - I Section, APSPDCL
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
