Dismissed¶¶34

Pydi Ramana @ Ramulu v. Kashatri Kali Singh

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Jul 2026CRP/1811/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; Civil Revision Petition No. 1811/2024; Pydi Ramana @ Ramulu v. Kashatri Kali Singh and others (Boddepalli family); Subba Reddy Satti, J.; pronounced 07.07.2026; revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against order dated 21.6.2024 in lA.No.13/2022 in OS.No.345/2008, Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikakulam; dismissed as infructuous on counsel's statement that the cause did not survive; no order as to costs; IA No. 1 of 2024 under Section 151 CPC (stay of suit) closed; no precedent discussed; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous, the cause therein not surviving for adjudication, with no order as to costs. ¶¶34

Pydi Ramana @ Ramulu Vs Kashatri Kali Singh — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading :

¶2

APHC010329372024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3331]

¶5

TUESDAY, THE 7^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶8

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1811/2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

PYDI RAMANA @ RAMULU, S/O LATE APPANNA, HINDU, AGED 83 YEARS. CULTIVATION, ORIGINALLY RESIDENT OF FAREEDPETA VILLAGE. PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

KASHATRI KALI SINGH, S/O LATE HARI SINGH, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O NEAR. TELUGU DESAM PARTY OFFICE, OPP INDU BEAUTY PARLOUR, SANA STREET (DCCB COLONY) SRIKAKULAM TOWN, PO AND DIST.

¶14

BODDEPALLI NARSIMHULU, S/O LATE RAMULU, HINDU, AGED 71 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶15

BODDEPALLI APPALANARASAMMA, W/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 61 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETAPANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶16

BODDEPALLI JAYARAM, S/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 33 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION,

¶17

Page 2 of 4

¶18

KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶19

BODDEPALLI SWAMY, S/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 29 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶20

BODDEPALLI KRISHNA, S/O NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 27 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶21

BODDEPALLI SYAMALA RAO, , SIO NARSIMHULU, HINDU, AGED 25 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O KINTALI MILL JUNCTION, KESAVARAOPETA PANCHAYAT AND PO. ETCHERLA (M), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. RESP

¶22

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶23

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to allow the Revision by setting aside the order of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikakulam, passed in lA.No.13/2022 in OS.No.345/2008 dated 21.6.2024 and consequently amend the plaint and pass

¶24

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.No.345/2008 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srikakulam, pending disposal of the petition and pass

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶27

1.O M R LAW FIRM

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶29

¶30

Page 3 of 4

¶31

The Court made the following:

¶32

::ORDER ::

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the civil revision petition has become infructuous.

¶34