Dismissed¶35

Yarradoddi Sankara Reddy v. Peddireddy Venkataswamy Reddy

Andhra Pradesh HC3 May 2026CRP/1704/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; Civil Revision Petition No. 1704/2024; Yarradoddi Sankara Reddy & Anr. v. Peddireddy Venkataswamy Reddy & Ors.; Justice Ravi Cheemalapati; decided 04.05.2026; withdrawal of revision petition by letter dated 27.04.2026; Article 227 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; O.S.No.21/2015; I.A.No.68/2024; Senior Civil Judge, Filer; recall of evidence of D7 to D9 and marking of documents; dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed; no merits adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition; CRP dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, closed. ¶35

Yarradoddi Sankara Reddy Vs Peddireddy… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3332]

¶2

APHC010324602024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1704/2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

YARRADODDI SANKARA REDDY, S/O. LATE Y. VENKATADRI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O. NOONEVANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, H/O. REGALLU, FILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶10

YARRADODDI BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O. LATE Y. VENKATADRI REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. COLONY, FILER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

PEDDIREDDY VENKATASWAMY REDDY, S/O. LATE P. NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/O. NAGIREDDY COLONY, FILER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶14

PEDDIREDDY SANTHAMMA, W/O. P. VENKATASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O. NAGIREDDY COLONY, FILER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶15

PEDDIREDDY RAMESH KUMAR REDDY, S/O. P. VENKATASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. NAGIREDDY COLONY, FILER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

¶16

YARRADODDI ANASUYAMMA, W/O. Y. RAMACHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. BALAMVARIPALLE VILLAGE, H/O. REGALLU, FILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶17

MARASANI KUMARAMMA, W/O. LATE M. VENKATARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. REGALLU VILLAGE AND POST

¶18

FILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶19

CHINTALA RAMANA REDDY, S/O. LATE C. RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. BALAMVARIPALLE VILLAGE, H/O. REGALLU, FILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶20

CHINTALA SURENDRA REDDY, S/O. LATE C RAMI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. BALAMVARIPALLE VILLAGE, H/O. REGALLU, FILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶21

YARRADODDI YALLA REDDY, S/O. LATE Y. KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. BALAMVARIPALLE VILLAGE, H/O. REGALLU, FILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶22

YARRADODDI RAMI REDDY, S/O. LATE Y. KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. BALAMVARIPALLE VILLAGE, H/O. REGALLU, FILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶23

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶24

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the order and decree Dt.01.07.2024 made in I.A.No.68/2024 in O.S.No.21/2015 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Filer in allowing the application filed U/Sec.151 C.F.C. to recall the evidence of D7 to D9 and to mark documents and to receive the same the above named petitioners humbly beg to present this Memorandum Revision petition for the following among other grounds that at the time of hearing. of Civil may be urged

¶25

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶26

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.21/2015 on the file of The Court of The Senior Civil Judge, Filer, pending disposal of the above CRP and to pass such

¶27

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶28

1.V S K RAMA RAO

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶30

1.C SUBODH

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Sri V.S.K.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that a letter dated 27.04.2026 has been addressed to the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the civil revision petition.

¶33