The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a Civil Revision Petition dated 1219 of 2014 for non-prosecution, as no representation was filed despite prior proceedings indicating the matter was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
AHHS,J C.R.P.No. 1219 of 2014
Dated 11.09.2026
APHC010544172014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3520]
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1219 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
2
AHHS,J C.R.P.No. 1219 of 2014
Dated 11.09.2026
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1219 OF 2014
ORDER:
1. No representation for Revision Petitioner.
2. The proceedings dated 25.08.2026 of this court indicated the
infructuous nature of the proceedings. In spite of the same, there is no representation.
3. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Under the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this Civil Revision petition shall stand closed.
_______________________________________ SRI JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA,J
Dated 11.09.2026 KS
Whether the order is : Speaking: Yes Reasoned : Yes Reportable: No Non-Reportable: Yes
3
AHHS,J C.R.P.No. 1219 of 2014
43
Dated 11.09.2026
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1219 OF 2014
Dated:11.09.2026.
KS
Teki Varalakshmi
Dosi Siva
The Deputy Executive Engineer, A.P.S.H.C.L.
The Tahsildar
The District Collector
A. Hari Haranadh Sarma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
