Dismissed

Pinapati Baburao, v. Pinapati Ananya

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Sept 2026CRP/1150/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, upon a civil revision petition, held that since the trial court had already dismissed the impleading application and issued notices, no interference was warranted. The court directed the trial court to dispose of the suit expeditiously within six months.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition was disposed of and the trial court directed to dispose of the suit within six months.

Pinapati Baburao, Vs Pinapati Ananya — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

APHC010200372026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 10^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

¶7

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1150 OF 2026

¶8

Between:

¶9

Pinapati Baburao,, S/o. Late Samadanam, aged 77 years, residing at D.No.14-42-38, Velivoluvari Stret, Morsipet, Tenali, Guntur District

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

Pinapati Ananya, D/o. Late Sarath Chandar, aged about 19 years, Student, Being Minor, Rep. by her natural guardian and mother, Pinapati @Bollepu Suneetha, W/o. Late Sarath Chandar,residing at D.No.54-1-7/22, Flat No.101, Blue Sky, Brundavan Apartments, Road No.2, R Mahanadu Road, Vijayawada.

¶13

Pinapati Aanya, D/o. Late Sarath Chandar, aged about 14 years, Student, Being Minor, Rep. by her natural guardian and mother, Pinapati @Bollepu Suneetha, W/o. Late Sarath Chandar residing at D.No.54-1-7/22, Flat No.101, Blue Sky, Brundavan Apartments, Road No.2, R Mahanadu Road, Vijayawada.

¶14

¶15

Dr Pinapati Bollipo Suneetha, W/o. Late Sarath Chandar, Aged about 42 years, Professor, residing at D.No.54-1-7/22, Flat No.101, Blue Sky, Brundavan Apartments, Road No.2, R Mahanadu Road, Vijayawada.

¶16

The Manager, State Bank of India, Morris pet, Tenali, Guntur District. residing at D.No.54-1-7/22, Flat No.101, Blue Sky, Brundavan Apartments, Road No.2, R Mahanadu Road, Vijayawada.

¶17

...Respondents

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: P A SESHU Counsel for the Respondents: HABIBULLA SHAIK

¶19

The Court made the following:

¶20

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1150 of 2026

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

The present revision is filed by the 1^st defendant aggrieved by the order dated 05.03.2026 passed in I.A.No.109 of 2026 in O.S.No.14 of 2020 by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tenali.

¶24

The plaintiffs filed I.A.No.109 of 2026 in O.S.No.14 of 2020 under Section 151 of C.P.C. requesting the Court to reopen the suit for filing an amendment petition in the interest of justice. The trial Court vide order dated 05.03.2026 has considered and allowed the said application and reopened the suit. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision is filed.

¶25

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/1^st defendant has contended that there is no necessity to implead the proposed parties, who are the sisters of the deceased P.Sarath Chandra, as they have no share or right in the suit schedule property. It is further contended that the proposed parties are sought to be impleaded only with a view to unnecessarily protract the proceedings.

¶26

¶27

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 submitted that subsequently, I.A. filed for impleading the proposed parties was also allowed and the suit is proceeding with further.

¶28

Considering the said submissions, as the subsequent I.A. has already been disposed of by the trial Court and notices have also been issued to the proposed parties, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the matter at this stage.

¶29

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, directing the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tenali, to consider the matter and dispose of O.S.No.14 of 2020, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶31

_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

¶32

Date: 10.09.2026 Ivd

¶33

¶34

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

¶35

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1150 of 2026

¶36

Dated: 10.09.2026

¶37

Ivd

Pinapati Baburao, v. Pinapati Ananya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pinapati Baburao, v. Pinapati Ananya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases