Dismissed¶31

Dusa Sahitya Balaram v. Shaik Babulal

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Apr 2026CRP/1014/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction); Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad; CRP No. 1014 of 2026; decided 10.04.2026; dismissal as withdrawal of Article 227 revision petition challenging docket order dated 02-03-2026 in I.A. No. 251 of 2024 in O.S. No. 9 of 2012 (I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Srikakulam) closing an Order XV-A Rule 2 CPC application to strike off defendants' defence for non-deposit of rent; petitioner Dusa Sahitya Balaram represented by GPA agent Kota Meher Kumar; counsel P. Sai Surya Teja; no costs; interlocutory applications closed; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition granted; CRP dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; interlocutory applications, if any, stand closed in terms of the order. ¶31

Dusa Sahitya Balaram Vs Shaik Babulal — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3328]

¶2

APHC010161372026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1014 OF 2026

¶9

Between:

¶10

DUSA SAHITYA BALARAM, S/O. LATE DUSA ADINARAYANA RAO NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, (PRESENTLY RESIDING AT USA) REP. BY HIS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY AGENT KOTA MEHER KUMAR, S/O RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.49-34-29/A, NGGO'S COLONY, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

SHAIK BABULAL, S/O. SHAIK MEERA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT SINGUPURAM VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDALAM AND DISTRICT.

¶14

BASURA SUDHAKARA RAO, S/O. LATE LAKSHMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50, RESIDING AT KELLA VEEDHI, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tohe present Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Docket Order Dated 02-03-2026 passed in I.A. No.251 of 2024 in O.S. No. 9 of 2012 by the Honble First Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Srikakulam G District whereby the learned trial court erroneously closed the

¶17

¶18

petition filed under Order XV-A Rule 2 CPC seeking striking off the defense of the respondents/defendants for failure to deposit rents, for the following

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased e pleased to permit Mr. Kota Meher Kumar, to appear, act and represent the petitioner Sri Dusa Sahitya Balaram in the above Civil Revision Petition including all interlocutory applications connected therewith through the General Power of Attorney and to pas

¶21

IA NO: 2 OF 2026

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 9 of 2012 on the file of the learned I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Srikakulam pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition, and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24