Complainant's revision against dismissal of a cheque-dishonour complaint and acquittal of the accused for complainant's absence. The complainant showed no interest even at the revisional stage; notice was not served. The High Court found no merit and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010201102019
[3521]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MON D AY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 767 of 2019
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
Revision filed und e r Section 397/401 of CrPC pra y ing that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, aggrieved by the o rder made in C.C.No.39 of 2019 dat e d 10-5-2019 on the file of Hon'ble II Addl . Judicial First Class Magistrate, Raja m ahendravaram dismissing the complai n t under section U/Sec.138 R/w.142 of NI Act, the complainant beg to pres e nt this Memorandum of Criminal Rev i sion Case
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K GANI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSEC U TOR (AP)
2
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the Petitioner, even on 13.07.2026 also there was no representation. This matter is posted to today under caption “For Dismissal” and it was further directed, if no arguments were advanced by learned counsel for the Petitioner the matter will be disposed of by appointing leaned Legal Aid Counsel for the Petitioner.
Rao, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the Respondent No.2.
3
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 20.07.2026
KK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional court should interfere with the acquittal under Section 256 Cr.P.C and dismissal of the complaint for the complainant's default.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Jasthi Sathish
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Koppisetty Venkanna Babu
Y. Lakshmana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
