B.Srinivasa Rao v. State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal revision case was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted that the related criminal appeal had already been partly allowed.
A criminal revision case was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted that the related criminal appeal had already been partly allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
[3521]
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010110902019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 396/2019
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K SAI MOHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following: ORDER :
Mr. Sai Shoban, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Sai Mohan
Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the criminal appeal has already been disposed of by partly allowing the appeal. Therefore, the present Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 13.07.2026
PRA
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
3
118
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.396 of 2019
Date: 13.07.2026
KMS
B. Srinivasa Rao
State of AP
Boora Sandhya
Boora Ramanaiah
Boora Ramabaayi
Boora Kanaka Rao
Y. Lakshmana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court