Dismissed

Sanganaboyina Chandra Sekhar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CRLRC/2729/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Revision Case, the petitioner submitted that the parties had entered into a compromise and requested withdrawal of the appeal. The Court dismissed the revision case as withdrawn and ordered the closure of any pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case dismissed as withdrawn; Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, stand closed.

Sanganaboyina Chandra Sekhar Vs The… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010727142018

¶2

[3548]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

¶8

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2729/2018

¶9

Between:

¶10

SANGANABOYINA CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O.SINGARAPPA, AGED 44 YRS, R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD.

¶14

SIDDAREDDYGARI RAMA SUBBA REDDY, S/O.PAKKEERA REDDY, AGED 55 YRS., R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶15

SIDDAREDDYGARI CHINNA ANKI REDDY, S/O.PAKKEERA REDDY, AGED 45 YRS, R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶16

RENDEDDULA HARINARAYANA REDDY, S/O.PULLANNA, AGED 34 YRS, R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶17

GADDAM SRINIVASULU, S/O.PULLANNA AGED 34 YRS, R/O.TALLAPRODDATUR VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision

¶20

¶21

GTK, J Crl.R.C.No.2729 of 2018

¶22

Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision Case by setting aside the order dated 17-08-2018 in S.C.No.240 of 2017 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur and pass

¶23

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in S.C.No.240 of 2017, on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Proddatur and pass

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶26

1.VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶28

1.P V N KIRAN KUMAR

¶29

2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶30

The Court made the following:

¶31

¶32

GTK, J Crl.R.C.No.2729 of 2018

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

Heard,

¶35

Mr.V.Ravi Kanth, learned counsel representing Mr.Venkat Reddy Kodumury, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, and Ms.Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

¶36

On 31.07.2026, a letter was addressed to the Registry by Mr.Venkat Reddy Kodumury, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, requesting that the Criminal Revision Case be posted under the caption ‘For Withdrawal’ on the ground that both the parties entered into compromise.

¶37

Owing to the said submission and the letter dated 31.07.2026 addressed to the Registry, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶38

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

___________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J

¶40

Date : 11-09-2026 BMS

Sanganaboyina Chandra Sekhar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanganaboyina Chandra Sekhar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases