The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati disposed of a Criminal Revision Case as infructuous without providing any substantive reasoning or legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3521]
APHC010064072020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 218/2020
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become
infructuous.
shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 16.09.2026 BMS
M NOORJAHAN
S SHAIKSHA VALI
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADHESH
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
