Dismissed

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. v. the State of A.P. & Another

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Sept 2026CRLRC/1987/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal revision case arising from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the petitioner sought to withdraw the revision after the matter was settled out of court. The High Court, upon hearing counsel and perusing the written memo, dismissed the criminal revision as withdrawn and ordered pending miscellaneous applications to close.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. Vs the State of A.P. & Another — Cheque Dishonour | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010306222009

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

THURSDAY, THE 10^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987 OF 2009

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/S. I.K.F.FINANCE LTD., rep. by its Director, Ch. V.Rama Rao, S/o Rosaiah, Vijayawada, Power of Attorney Holder of HDFC Bank Ltd., Registered office at Bank House, Senapathi Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013 and having branch,

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad.

¶12

Ashfaa, S/o Rajvvan Sab, R/o H.No.585/7, 3rd Cross, Narasarajpet, Behind Mudagowdru Primary School, Devanagar - 577 001.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to submit this Memorandum of Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the order in C.F.No.10000 of 2009, dt.23-10-2009 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶15

IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 2777 OF 2009

¶16

¶17

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Crl.R.C., pending disposal of the Crl.R.C.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: V R AVULA Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶20

The Court made the following Order:

¶21

¶22

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009

¶23

Dated 10.09.2026

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶25

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987 OF 2009

¶26

The Court made the following Order:

¶27

The memo filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

¶28

The memo contends a letter from the petitioner, wherein, the petitioner intends to withdraw the revision case.

¶29

The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against order dated 23-10-2009 passed in C.F.No.10000 of 2009 by learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District, where under, the complaint filed by the petitioner against the accused under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was returned for want of jurisdiction.

¶30

It appears from the memo that the matter has been settled out of the Court and for which the petitioner intends to withdraw the instant Criminal Revision Case.

¶31

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶32

Perused the written memo and the instructions of the petitioner.

¶33

Considering the same, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

¶35

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026

¶36

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶37

closed.

¶38

____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶39

Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI

¶40

¶41

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1987 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026

¶42

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶43

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1987 OF 2009

¶44

Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. v. the State of A.P. & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. v. the State of A.P. & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases