Dismissed

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. v. the State of A.P. & Another

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Sept 2026CRLRC/1985/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Revision Case filed under CPC against an order returning a complaint alleged to be under Section 138 NI Act, the High Court considered a memo indicating the petitioner's intention to withdraw the revision due to an out-of-court settlement. The court dismissed the revision proceedings as withdrawn and closed pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Revision Case was dismissed as withdrawn; pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. Vs the State of A.P. & Another — Cheque Dishonour | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010604142009

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

THURSDAY, THE 10^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1985 OF 2009

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/S. I.K.F.FINANCE LTD., rep. by its Director, Ch. V.Rama Rao, S/o Rosaiah, Vijayawada, Power of Attorney Holder of HDFC Bank Ltd., Registered office at Bank House, Senapathi Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400 013 and having branch,

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad.

¶12

S Manooth, S/o Said Mustaffa, R/o No.430A, Railway Colony, Podanur (P), Coimbatore - 641 023. Tamil Nadu.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto submit this Memorandum of Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the order in C.F.No. 6059 of 2009, dt. 09-10-2009 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶15

IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 2775 OF 2009

¶16

¶17

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1985 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Crl.R.C., pending disposal of the Crl.R.C.,

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: V R AVULA

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶21

The Court made the following order:

¶22

¶23

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1985 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶25

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1985 OF 2009

¶26

The Court made the following Order:

¶27

The memo filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

¶28

The memo contends a letter from the petitioner, wherein, the petitioner intends to withdraw the revision case.

¶29

The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against order dated 09-10-2009 passed in C.F.No.6059 of 2009 by learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, where under, the complaint filed by the petitioner against the accused under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was returned for want of jurisdiction.

¶30

It appears from the memo that the matter has been settled out of the Court and for which the petitioner intends to withdraw the instant Criminal Revision Case.

¶31

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶32

Perused the written memo and the instructions of the petitioner.

¶33

Considering the same, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

¶35

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1985 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026

¶36

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶37

____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶38

Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI

¶39

¶40

SS, J Crl.R.C.No.1985 of 2009 Dated 10.09.2026

¶41

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

¶42

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1985 OF 2009

¶43

Dated: 10-09-2026 MSI

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. v. the State of A.P. & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. I.K.F.Finance Ltd. v. the State of A.P. & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases