Tadi Satti Reddy, v. the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd., & 8 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: criminal revision; acquittal; interference by High Court in acquittal; Sections 324, 326 and 34 IPC; grievous/simple hurt; non-explanation of injuries on accused; free fight between two groups; both parties injured; actual assailant indeterminate; contradictions in prosecution evidence; charge not proved beyond reasonable doubt; no perversity; de facto complainant; Section 397/401 CrPC; Section 151 CPC delay condonation (113 days); CRL.R.C. No.131 of 2009; C.C. No.7 of 2004; Addl. Judicial Magistrate/J.F.C.M. Ramachandrapuram; East Godavari; Pulagurta/Pulagurtha village; Anaparthy Mandal; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Justice Subhendu Samanta; decision dated 10 July 2026; revision dismissed as devoid of merit.
What did the court decide?
On consideration of the entire material on record and the findings of the learned Magistrate, the impugned finding suffers no illegality; the observations and findings of the learned Magistrate suffer from no illegality or perversity, and the order of acquittal has been justifiably recorded.