Gorrela Rama Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.R.C.No.1221 of 2025; High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati; criminal revision dismissed; Sections 438 and 442 BNSS; D.V.C.No.52 of 2024; Special Judicial First Class Magistrate Mobile Court Eluru; service of summons Respondent No.1 Budapest Hungary; memo by complainant's counsel; proof of service; postal tracking; objections 31-07-2025 not considered; vakalatnama; locus standi; no interference with trial court order; costs Rs.20,000/- to wife Respondent No.2; adjournment 10.03.2026; Gorrela Rama Rao; Gorrela Jayalakshmi; Gorrela Sudha Rani; Gorrela alias Peddinti Anusha; Gandham S.R. Prasad; Eluru Sesha Mahesh Babu; K. Priyanka Lakshmi APP; Dr. Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa; 06.03.2026.
What did the court decide?
This Court confirmed the trial Judge's observation: counsel for the Petitioners, having filed no vakalatnama for Respondent No.1, cannot raise objections regarding service of summons on Respondent No.1; the issue can be agitated only by Respondent No.1 or by his authorized counsel.