Dismissed¶35

Shaik Rasik Ur Rahim v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC4 Jan 2026CRLP/827/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quash petition under S.482 Cr.P.C / S.528 BNSS (Criminal Petition No. 827/2023) by accused A5 Shaik Rasik Ur Rahim against C.C. No. 4025 of 2022 (Judicial First Class, Special Mobile Court Magistrate, Kurnool); complainant Syed Adeeba Fayeez; State of A.P. represented by Public Prosecutor and K. Priyanka Lakshmi, APP; petitioner unrepresented at hearing; Registry reported the matter before the Trial Court settled before Lok Adalat; petition dismissed as infructuous and interim applications (certified-copy dispensation, appearance exemption, stay) closed; no merits adjudication; single bench of Dr Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa; decided 05.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

As the matter before the Trial Court is settled before Lok-adalat, no further orders are required in this petition. ¶34

Shaik Rasik Ur Rahim Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Bail and Remand | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3396]

¶2

APHC010051242023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 827/2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

SHAIK RASIK UR RAHIM, SON OF ABDUL RAHIM AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS, A RESIDENT OF 13-3, LALBAGH ROAD, WILSON GARDEN, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY S.H.O., P.S. KURNOOL TALUKA P.S. KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AMARAVATHI

¶12

SYED ADEEBA FAYEEZ, WIFE OF MAHAMMAD ZUBER, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS OCCUPATION BUSINESS, A RESIDENT OF 3- 121-5-1, BALAJI NAGAR, STANTANPURAM VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

¶13

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

¶14

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash C.C. no 4025 of 2022 against the Petitioner/A5 on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class, Special Mobile Court Magistrate, Kurnool, and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Charge Sheetin CC 4025 of 2022, on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class, Special Mobile Court Magistrate, Kurnool

¶19

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the appearance of the petitioner in CC 4025 of 2022, on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class, Special Mobile Court Magistrate, Kurnool

¶21

IA NO: 3 OF 2023

¶22

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all proceedings in CC 4025 of 2022 on the file of the court of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class, Special Mobile Court Magistrate, Kurnool

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

¶24

1.BASHEER AHMED

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

¶26

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶27

2.SHAFATH AHMED KHAN

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

¶30

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 827/2023

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

None represented on behalf of the petitioners.

¶33

Mrs. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.

¶34

As can be seen from the information received from the Registry, the matter before the Trial Court is settled before Lok-adalat. Hence, no further orders are required in this petition.

¶35

In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous.

¶36

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶37

__________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS

Shaik Rasik Ur Rahim v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Rasik Ur Rahim v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gavvalapalli Siva Parvathi, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Chinta Nageswara Vijayalakshmi Vs State of Ap

Kommi Narasimhulu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Vunnam Narayanamma Vs the State of Ap

Medavarapu Veerabhadra Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kothapalli Satyavathi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh