Dismissed

P Subramanyam Reddy @ Bujji Reddy v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Sept 2026CRLP/8247/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in FIR No. 143/2024. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had already been filed. The petitioners then sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to challenge the charge sheet; interlocutory applications closed.

P Subramanyam Reddy @ Bujji Reddy Vs the State of… — Quashing and FIR | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010510252024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

FRIDAY, THE 18^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8247 OF 2024

¶5

Between:

¶6

P SUBRAMANYAM REDDY @ BUJJI REDDY, S/o. P. Subramanyam Reddy, Aged about 53 years, R/o 2-23, Jandia Peta, Kasavarajapuram Agraharam, Chittoor District.

¶7

P. Bhaskar Reddy,, S/o. P. Govinda Reddy Aged about 63 years, R/o 2-22, Jandia Peta, Kasavarajapuram Agraharam, Chittoor District

¶8

P Venu Reddy,, S/o. P Bhaskara Reddy Aged about 38 years, R/o 2-22, Jandia Peta, Kasavarajapuram Agraharam, Chittoor District

¶9

P. Suresh Reddy,, S/o. P. Subramanyam Reddy, Aged about 29 years, R/o 2-23, Jandia Peta, Kasavarajapuram Agraharam Chittoor District.

¶10

T. Ekambaram Reddy,, S/o T. Harinadha Reddy, Aged about 36 years, R/o 2-28B, Jandala Peta, Kasavarajapuram, Agraharam Chittoor District.

¶11

...Petitioners

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. Through The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vedurukuppam Police Station, chittoor.

¶14

¶15

P Ramachandra Naidu, S/o P Venkatamuni Naidu, Aged about 36 years, JandlaPeta Village, K Nagar Mandal, Chittoor District.

¶16

...Respondents Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 5 in FIR No. 143/2024 on the file of Vedurukuppam Police Station, Chittoor District and pass

¶17

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of FIR No.143/2024 on the file of Vedurukuppam Police Station, Chittoor District and pass

¶19

IA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the arrest of the Petitioners/Accu sed No. 1 to 5 in FIR No. 143/2024 on the file of Vedurukuppam Police Station, Chittoor District and pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioners: P B REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: PARIMI RAMA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶22

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶24

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8247 of 2024

¶25

The Court made the following Order:

¶26

Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioners herein (A1 to A5), seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.143 of 2024 of Vedurukuppam Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶27

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent-State, basing on the written instructions, submits that the police have filed a charge sheet in FIR in Crime No.143 of 2024 of Vedurukuppam Police Station, Chittoor District, before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

¶28

At that juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a liberty to challenge the charge sheet, in accordance with the law, if so advised.

¶29

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, by granting liberty to pursue legal remedies, in accordance with the law.

¶30

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶31

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶32

Date: 18.09.2026 PSA

¶33

¶34

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶35

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8247 of 2024

¶36

Date: 18.09.2026

¶37

PSA

P Subramanyam Reddy @ Bujji Reddy v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P Subramanyam Reddy @ Bujji Reddy v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases