Allowed

Akhilesh Yaramsal alias Akhilesh Malleshapa Yaramsal v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC14 Sept 2026CRLP/7763/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court modified bail conditions for two accused, enlarging them on bond with sureties instead of other conditions, citing deplorable financial status, while retaining residual trial court conditions.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties; residual conditions remained applicable.

Akhilesh Yaramsal alias Akhilesh Malleshapa Yaramsal… — Bail and Remand | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3521]

¶2

APHC010464442026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

TUESDAY, THE 15^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7763/2026

¶9

Between:

¶10

AKHILESH YARAMSAL ALIAS AKHILESH MALLESHAPA YARAMSAL, S/O. MALLESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,R/O. D.NO.55, BASAVNAGAR, BEGGED, OLD HUBLI,DHARWAD, KARNATAKA STATE.

¶11

SHABAZ RAFIQ AHAMAD KHATIB ALIAS SHABAZ, S/O. RAFIQ AHAMAD KHATIB, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,R/O. 1 CROSS, JANNAT NAGAR, BEHIND MASJID,HUBLI, DHARWAD DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.

¶12

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

¶15

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

¶17

GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

¶19

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶20

¶21

Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.7763 of 2026 Dated 15.09.2026

¶22

The Court made the following:

¶23

ORDER :

¶24

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 483(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to modify the condition imposed on the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 vide order dated 18.08.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.17 of 2026 in Crime No.82 of 2026 of Government Railway Police Station, Vizianagaram District, passed by the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act-Cum-I Additional Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram.

¶25

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the financial condition of the petitioners is deplorable and that they are unable to comply with the conditions imposed by the learned Trial Court.

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

¶27

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 18.08.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.17 of 2026 in Crime No.82 of 2026 of Government Railway Police Station, passed by the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act-Cum-I Additional Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram, against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 is hereby modified as under:

¶28

¶29

Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.7763 of 2026 Dated 15.09.2026

¶30

i. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on

¶31

bail subject to their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VI Additional

¶32

Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways, Visakhapatnam.

¶33

The residual conditions imposed by the learned Trial Court, in the original order shall remain in force and shall be duly complied with by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2.

¶34

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶35

_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J

¶36

Date: 15.09.2026 RSI/DRNR

¶37

¶38

Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.7763 of 2026 Dated 15.09.2026

¶39

¶40

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶41

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7763 of 2026

¶42

Date: 15.09.2026

¶43

RSI/DRNR

Akhilesh Yaramsal alias Akhilesh Malleshapa Yaramsal v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhilesh Yaramsal alias Akhilesh Malleshapa Yaramsal v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases