Dismissed¶23

Kedam Subbarayudu v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Apr 2026CRLP/7761/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition dismissed as infructuous; underlying C.C.No.554 of 2022 (Crime No.231 of 2022, Banaganapalli Police Station, Nandyal; JMFC Banaganapalli, Kurnool) for offences under Sections 509 and 506 read with 34 IPC ended in Lok Adalat compromise with acquittal of accused under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. on 14.09.2024; petitioner unrepresented; no precedent discussed. High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, single Bench (K. Sreenivasa Reddy, J.), decided 07.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Recording the Assistant Public Prosecutor's submission that the parties in C.C.No.554 of 2022 compromised before the Lok Adalat and the accused were acquitted in terms of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C., nothing survives for adjudication and the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. ¶23

Kedam Subbarayudu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010511122023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3327]

¶4

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7761/2023

¶8

Between: Kedam Subbarayudu

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

¶12

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)

¶13

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

¶14

1.G V S MEHAR KUMAR

¶15

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

¶16

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶17

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶18

This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/A1 to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.554 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Banaganapalli, Kurnool, (Crime No.231 of 2022 of Banaganapalli Police Station, Nandyal), registered for the offences punishable under Sections 509 and 506 read with 34 IPC.

¶19

There is no representation on behalf of petitioner.

¶20

SRK, J CrlP No.7761 of 2023

¶21

¶22

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that both the parties in C.C.No.554 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Banaganapalli, Kurnool, have compromised the matter before the Lok Adalat and the accused were acquitted in terms of Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. of the offences alleged, on 14.09.2024 and in view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in the Criminal Petition and the matter has become infructuous.

¶23