A criminal petition filed before arraignment was dismissed as premature due to lack of fitness to frame charges, though liberty was granted to approach the court once arraigned as accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3521]
APHC010462072026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7714/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
2
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
The Court made the following: ORDER :
The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the Petitioners
have not yet been arraigned as Accused.
liberty is granted to the Petitioners to approach this Court as and when they are arraigned as Accused, in accordance with law.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 10.09.2026 KMS
3
64
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7714/2026
Date: 10.09.2026 KMS
DEVULLA VASANTHA
DEVULLA PRASANTHI
DEVULLA JYOSTHNA
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NUNE VENKATA REDDY
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
