Allowed

Toni Sing v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Sept 2026CRLP/7666/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the Criminal Petition to modify bail conditions under the NDPS Act, reducing the bond amount to Rs.50,000 with two sureties due to the petitioner's financial status. The court disposed of the petition by modifying the order dated 14.08.2026 while keeping residual conditions in force.

What did the court decide?

Bail order modified to Rs.50,000 bond with two sureties of similar amount to the satisfaction of Additional Judicial Magistrate, Narsipatnam.

Toni Sing Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Narcotics (NDPS) | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3521]

¶2

APHC010459632026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 10^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7666/2026

¶8

Between:

¶9

TONI SING, S/O SURJEET SINGH, AGE 36 YEARS, NAVAJEEVAN VIHAR,VINDHANAGARANA, SINGRULLI DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Amaravathi.

¶13

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

¶15

1.DASARI RAMAKOTESWAR RAO

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

¶17

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER :

¶19

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 483(1)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to

¶20

¶21

modify the condition imposed on the Petitioner/Accused No.1 vide order dated 14.08.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.1883 of 2026 in Crime No.73 of 2017 in NSC No.339 of 2018 of Rolugunta Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for Trial of offences under ‘the NDPS Act’, Visakhapatnam (for brevity ‘the learned Trial Court’).

¶22

The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the financial condition of the Petitioner is deplorable and he is unable to comply with the conditions imposed by the learned Trial Court.

¶23

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 14.08.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.1883 of 2026 in Crime No.73 of 2017 in NSC No.339 of 2018 of Rolugunta Police Station, passed by the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for Trial of offences under ‘the NDPS Act’, Visakhapatnam, against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 is hereby modified as under:

¶24

“The Petitioner/Accused No.1 is ordered to be released on bail

¶25

on execution of personal bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Narsipatnam.”

¶26

¶27

The residual conditions imposed by ‘the learned Trial Court’ in the

¶28

original order shall remain in force and shall be duly complied with by the

¶29

Petitioner/Accused No.1.

¶30

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶31

_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J

Date: 10.09.2026 PRA

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶36

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7666 of 2026

¶37

Date: 10.09.2026

¶38

PRA

Toni Sing v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Toni Sing v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases