Dismissed¶26

Dr. Ananthoji Gopinadham, v. Smt. Ananthoji Bharathi Devi

Andhra Pradesh HC23 Feb 2026CRLP/7494/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Petition 7494/2021, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Dr Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao; decision 24.02.2026; dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated absence of petitioners/accused and counsel B V Krishna Reddy; respondents: complainant Smt Ananthoji Bharathi Devi and State SHO, Disha Women Police Station, Eluru (Public Prosecutor AP); pending interlocutory applications closed; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Owing to continued absence of representation by the Petitioners and their counsel despite sufficient opportunity, the Court concluded that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. ¶25

Dr. Ananthoji Gopinadham, Vs Smt. Ananthoji Bharathi Devi — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3521]

¶2

APHC010513292021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7494/2021

¶9

Between:

¶10

1.DR. ANANTHOJI GOPINADHAM,, S/O RAJAYYA, MALE, 60 YEARS,. DOCTOR BY PROFESSION, RIO H.NO. 7-4-406/3, KALYAN NAGAR, BALANAGAR, R.R. DISTRICT, TELANGANA.

¶11

2.SRNT. ANANTHOJI SWAPNA @- PREETHI,, W/O DASARI PRAVEEN KUMAR, FEMALE, 25 YEARS,.EMPLOYED IN AUSTRALIA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 49 DRYSDALE DR LAMBTON NEW SOUTH WALES, 2299, AUSTRALIA.

¶12

3.ANANTHOJI @ ANNTOSH SAI KUMAR., S/O GOPINADHAM, MALE AGED 34 YEARS, EMPLOYED IN AUSTRALIA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 49 DRYSDALE DR LAMBTON NEW SOUTH WALES, 2299, AUSTRALIA,

¶13

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

¶14

AND

¶15

1.SMT ANANTHOJI BHARATHI DEVI, W/O SAL CHANDU, (DIE LATE TEKI RAMALINGESWARA RAO) FEMALE, AGED 30 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, PRESENTLY AT FLAT NO.401, S.S. APARTMENTS, AGRAHARAM, VAIBHAV FORT, RAMAKOTI, ELURU-534 001, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AP WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶16

2.THE STATE SHO, DISHA WOMEN P.S., ELURU, WEST QODAVAHDISTRICT, REP. THROUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, A.P. AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

¶17

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

¶19

1.B V KRISHNA REDDY

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

¶21

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶22

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER:

¶24

Despite the matter having been listed, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. Even on the last occasion also there was no representation. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioners nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case.

¶25

In view of the continued absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings.

¶26

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.

¶27

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶28

_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J

¶29

Dt: 24.02.2026 VTS

Dr. Ananthoji Gopinadham, v. Smt. Ananthoji Bharathi Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Ananthoji Gopinadham, v. Smt. Ananthoji Bharathi Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vandana Katare Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Koduru Kiran Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

R.Ramesh Reddy, Vs The Director

Sayana Vasumathi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kunjam Srinu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kotam Nagalakshmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh