Disposed¶30

Sri Machavarapu Rajesh v. Smt.Machavarapu Sri Dhanalakshmi

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Feb 2026CRLP/6633/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court Amaravati; Criminal Petition 6633/2021; Dr Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao; decided 18.02.2026; petitioners/accused Machavarapu Rajesh, Venubabu, Machavarapu Rangamani, Korumilli Sirisha, Shanmukha Nageswararao (Krishna District); respondent/complainant Machavarapu Sri Dhanalakshmi and State of AP; counsel Kalla Tulasi Durgamba; Assistant Public Prosecutor A. Sai Rohith; settlement before Lok Adalath; petition disposed of as compromised; no costs; interlocutory applications closed; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition disposed of as compromised following the reported settlement before the Lok Adalath; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand closed. ¶30

Sri Machavarapu Rajesh Vs Smt.Machavarapu Sri Dhanalakshmi — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3521]

¶2

APHC010454632021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6633/2021

¶9

Between:

¶10

1.SRI MACHAVARAPU RAJESH, S/O VENUBABU, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC. DAILY WAGE WORKER AS BARBOUR , R/O. DO. NO. 2722,NAYIBRAHMIN STREET, PAMARRU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶11

2.SRI.VENUBABU, S/O KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DO. NO. 27-22, NAYIBRAHMIN STREET, PAMARRU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶12

3.SMT. MACHAVARAPU RANGAMANI,, W/O VENUBABU, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. DO. NO, 27-22, NAYIBRAHMIN STREET, PAMARRU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶13

4.SMT. KORUMILLI SIRISHA,, W/O. SHANMUKHA NAGESWARARAO, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 1-192, SERIVELPUR, SIDDANTHAM, GUDIVADA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶14

5.SRI. SHANMUKHA NAGESWARARAO, S/O. LAKSHMINARAYANA AGED 26 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS. R/O. 1 -192, SERIVELPUR, SIDDANTHAM, GUDIV ADA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶15

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

¶16

AND

¶17

1.SMT MACHAVARAPU SRI DHANALAKSHMI, W/O. MACHAVARAPU RAJESH, D/O. EDARA SIVAIAH// AGED 20 YEARS, OCC. TAILOR, R/O. NTR COLONY, PEDANA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶18

2.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT AT ANDHRA PRADESH

¶19

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

¶21

1.KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

¶23

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶24

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

No representation for the Petitioners.

¶28

Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

¶29

submits that the case has become settled before the Lok Adalath.

¶30

Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as

¶31

compromised. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶33

_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J

¶34

Dt: 18.02.2026 VTS

Sri Machavarapu Rajesh v. Smt.Machavarapu Sri Dhanalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Machavarapu Rajesh v. Smt.Machavarapu Sri Dhanalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cherukuri Venkateswara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K Radhalakshmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

N.v.S.Prakash Rao Vs Sykam Srinivasa Reddy

Thalagani @ Tanagane Guru Prasad, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Matam Kumara Linga Murthy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

P Sri Gouri Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh