Disposed

Boddula Siva Prakash v. Tetali Satya Sai Baba Reddy

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Sept 2026CRLP/4417/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to withdraw a criminal petition challenging an order of the IV Additional District Judge, Tanuku. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, with liberty to pursue other legal remedies.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other legal remedies; pending interlocutory applications closed.

Boddula Siva Prakash Vs Tetali Satya Sai Baba Reddy — Bail and Remand | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010180522025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE 16^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4417 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

BODDULA SIVA PRAKASH, S/o. Siva Surya Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 34 Years, R/o. D.No.3-105, Near Ramalayam Temple, Raja Veedhi, Dwarapudi Village, Vizianagaram Mandal and District

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

TETALI SATYA SAI BABA REDDY, S/o. Veera Reddy, aged about 45 Years, R/o. D.No.7-63, Penugonda Village 85 Mandal, West Godavari District

¶12

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the order dated 18.03.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.61 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.315 of 2023 on the file of the Honhle IV Additional District Judge, Tanuku and allow the criminal petition and pass

¶15

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioner in Crl.A.No.315 of 2023 on the file of the Hon’ble IV Additional District Judge, Tanuku, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondents:

¶19

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4417 of 2025

¶22

The Court made the following Order:

¶23

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned

¶24

counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition, with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law.

¶25

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent-State expressed no objection for the same.

¶26

3. Permission is accorded.

¶27

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law.

¶28

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶29

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶30

Date: 16.09.2026 PSA

¶31

¶32

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶33

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4417 of 2025

¶34

Date: 16.09.2026

¶35

PSA

Boddula Siva Prakash v. Tetali Satya Sai Baba Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Boddula Siva Prakash v. Tetali Satya Sai Baba Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases