Dismissed

Vura Gopi v. Vura Nagamani

Andhra Pradesh HC14 Sept 2026CRLP/2960/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to quash a family court order under Section 482 CrPC and Section 528 BNSS. During hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other legal remedies. The Assistant Public Prosecutor raised no objection. The court granted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other legal remedies; interlocutory applications closed.

Vura Gopi Vs Vura Nagamani — Maintenance and Alimony | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010197232026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

¶2

PRADESH

¶3

AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3504]

¶6

TUESDAY, THE 15^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO

¶9

KUNCHEAM

¶10

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2960/2026

¶11

Between:

¶12

VURA GOPI, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC.ASTROLOGER, D.NO. 9-388/4, VEPACHETTU CENTRE, YERRABALEM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶13

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶14

AND

¶15

VURA NAGAMANI, W/O. VURA GOPI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE, D.NO.21-59,SIDDARDHA NAGAR, GOLLAPUDI VILLAGE VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521225

¶16

VURA KEERTHI, D/O. VURA GOPI AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS. STUDENT - MOTHERS PROTECTION, D.NO.2159, SIDDARDHA NAGAR, GOLLAPUDI VILLAGE VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT521225

¶17

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AT AMARAVATI THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VUYYURU RURAL POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of

¶19

¶20

Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to allow the present petition and quash the impugned order passed in Crl.M.P.No.747 of 2024 in F.C.O.P.No.926 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Family Court - CUM - IV Addl. District Court, Vijayawada dated 10-02-2026 as being illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the settled principles of law, and consequently dismiss the proceedings initiated by the respondents, in the interest of justice.

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶22

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay for all further proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.747 of 2024 in F.C.O.P.No.926 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Family Court - CUM - IV Addl. District Court, Vijayawada dated 10-02-2026, pending disposal of the present petition, in the interest of justice.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

¶24

1.KHAJA KHUTUBUDDIN SHAIK

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶30

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2960 of 2026

¶31

The Court made the following Order:

¶32

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned

¶33

counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law.

¶34

Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

¶35

expressed no objection for the same.

¶36

Permission is accorded.

¶37

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶38

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶39

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

Date: 15.09.2026 RMR

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶44

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2960 of 2026

¶45

RMR

¶46

Date: 15.09.2026

Vura Gopi v. Vura Nagamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vura Gopi v. Vura Nagamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases