Amavasya Nageswara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATt

¶2

.. .wT" S
t r
X'

¶3

ilr

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUAR^i TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

iPRESENT:

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 277 OF 2026

¶7

Between:

¶8

Amavasya Nageswara Rao, S/o. Chinna Venkateswarlu, Aged about 46 Years, Occ: Agriculturalist, R/o ST Colony, Madugula Village, Gurazala Mandal, Palnadu District.

¶9

Amavasya Naga Prasad, S/o. Chinna Venkateswarlu, Aged about 45 Years, Occ: Agriculturalist, R/o ST Colony, Madugula Village, Gurazala Mandal, Palnadu District.

¶10

...Petitioner/Accused No.1 &2

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

¶13

...Respondent/Complainant / Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused No. 1 and 2 by granting regular bail in Crime No.141/2025 on the file of Gurazala Town Police Station, Palnadu District.

¶14

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the^Petition and^the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ramalakshmana Reddy Sanepalli, Advocate for the Petitioners and of Public Prosecutor for Respondent, the Court made the following

¶15

3

¶16

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 277/2026

¶17

ORDER:

¶18

The instant petition under Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2024 (for short ‘BNSS’) read^{withSections437} and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’),^hasbeenfiled by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2, seeking regular bail in Crime No. 141/2025 on the file of Gurazala Town Police Station, Palnadu District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109 (1) r/w 3(5) of BNS.

¶19

Heard Sri Ramalakshmana Reddy Sanepalli, learned counsel^forthe Petitioners and Mrs. K.Priyanka Lakshmi learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, representing the State.

¶20

The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the de facto complainant submitted a report stating that she had been working as an Aaya in the Anganwadi Centre located in the ST Colony of the village for the past 30 years. For the last 20 years, Amavasya Krishnaveni, belonging to the same village and caste, has been working as the Anganwadi^{Teacherandhasbeen} continuously harassing the complainant. Due to her advanced age and inability to bear the said harassment, the complainant deputed her daughter to work as an Aaya in her place. The accused Krishnaveni allegedly subjected the complainant’s daughter also to similar harassment. On 29.11.2025 at about 11:00 A.M., while the complainant was proceeding from her house

¶21

’ 4

¶22

towards the Anganwadi Centre, the accused Krishnaveni called her on the way, enquired about her daughter, questioned her absence from duty, and abused the complainant in filthy language. Thereafter,^{on01.12.2025atabout} 08:30 A.M., while the complainant Was going into the village to deliver milk the accused Krishnaveni, along with other accused, allegedly waylaid her. verbally abused her, rushed towards her, and assaulted her. When the complainant’s son intervened to rescue her, he was^alsobeaten. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that^{theaccusedNo.1} herein is the husband of Accused No.3 and the Accused No.2 is the brother of the Accused No.1. There is dispute between the accused No.3 and the defacto complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioners^{wouldfurthersubmit} that Accused No.3 and the defacto complainant are working as Anganwadi Workers for the last 20 years. The injuries suffered by the victim are simple in nature. There is no intention on the part of the accused, even from the contents of the complaint and the study of the injury is concerned, the application of Section 109 is not possible. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that by this time, the investigation might have completed and wound certificate is also received. The petitioners are ready to furnish the sureties to the satisfaction of the Court. They have been in judicial custody since 04.12.2025 and finally prays to allow the petition by imposing any conditions.

¶23

5

¶24

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that as per the wound certificate, the victims suffered simple injuries. The matter is pending for arrest of Accused No.3, the wife, who is absconding. So far as, the investigation is concerned, 11 witnesses were examined in this matter. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor finally prays for dismissal of the petition.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on perusal of the material on record, and the stage of investigation is concerned, 11 witnesses were examined so far. The wound certificate discloses that the injuries sustained by the victim are simple in nature. Further, the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 have been in judicial custody since 04.12.2025. In that view of the matter, this Court is inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 with the following stringent conditions;

¶26

i. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 shall be enlarged^on bail subject to their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/(Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties^eachfor the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurazala.

¶27

ii. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e., on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet.

¶28

6

¶29

iii. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 shall not leave^thelimitsof the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission^fromthe Station House Officer concerned.

¶30

iv. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future.

¶31

V. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2, directly or indirectly,^make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted^with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

¶32

vi. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 shall cooperate^withthe investigating officer in further investigation of the^caseandshall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer as and when required.

¶33