Dismissed

Bandi Mekala Balaramudu @ Balu v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CRLP/2643/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati dismissed Criminal Petition No. 2643 of 2024 as infructuous. The petitioner argued that the cause did not survive for further adjudication, a submission not disputed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous; interlocutory applications pending had their status closed.

Bandi Mekala Balaramudu @ Balu Vs the State… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010180682024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2643 OF 2024

¶6

Between:

¶7

BANDI MEKALA BALARAMUDU @ BALU, S/o. Obulesu, Aged about 38 years, Ambedkar Nagar, Yadiki Village, Yadiki Mandal, Ananthapur District

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi, Through Station House Officer, Yadiki Police Station, Anantapuram District.

¶10

Gattu Alexander, S/o Gattu Mark, Age 45 yrs. Occupation Tahsildar, Yadiki Mandal. Anantapuram District.

¶11

...Respondents

¶12

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 178/2023 on the file of Yadiki Police Station, Anantapuram District and pass

¶13

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of

¶15

¶16

Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of in FIR No. 178/2023 on the file of Yadiki Police Station, Anantapuram District, and pass

¶17

IA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in FIR No. 178/2023 on the file of Yadiki Police Station, Anantapuram District, pending disposal of the quash petition and pass

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: VIJAYA KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶20

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2643 of 2024

¶22

The Court made the following Order:

¶23

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned

¶24

counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present

¶25

Criminal Petition does not survive for further adjudication.

¶26

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has not disputed the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶27

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as

¶28

infructuous.

¶29

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand

¶30

closed.

¶31

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶32

Date: 11.09.2026 PSA

¶33

¶34

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶35

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2643 of 2024

¶36

Date: 11.09.2026

¶37

PSA

Bandi Mekala Balaramudu @ Balu v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bandi Mekala Balaramudu @ Balu v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases