Disposed

Koribilli Nani Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CRLP/11529/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to quash FIR No. 481/2025 under Sections 69 and 88 BNS. During hearing, petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue other legal remedies. The State raised no objection. The court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, closing pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other legal remedies; interlocutory applications closed.

Koribilli Nani Babu Vs The State of Andhra… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010592882025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11529 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Koribilli Nani Babu, S/o K. Dasu Babu,Aged about 30 years, Occ Private employee,R/o.H.No. 18-35-48/1, Jaga Jeevan Ram Colony,Visaldiapatnam Commissionerate, Vishakapatnam District.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Station House Officer,PS Muwalavaripalem,Rep.by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

¶12

Ravada Likhitha, D/o Bhaskara Rao,R/o 6-10-14, Chinna Valtair,Peethalavanipalem, Vishakpatnam District.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 481 of 2025 Dated: 31.10.2025 under Sections 69 & 88 BNS pending before the Police Station Muvvalavanipalem, Visakhapatnam District

¶15

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified may be pleased to dispense with copy of the FIR No. 481 of 2025 Dated: 31.10.2025 on the file of the SHO, Muwalavanipalem, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the Criminal complaint and to pass such

¶18

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant a stay of all further Proceedings in FIR No. 481 of 2025 Dated: 31.10.2025 with the following Sections 69 & 88 BNS in the Police Station Muvvalavanipalem, Vishakapatnama District pending disposal of the Criminal complaint and to pass

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SATISH KUMAR BANDARU Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11529 of 2025

¶24

The Court made the following Order:

¶25

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned

¶26

counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition, with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law.

¶27

2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of

¶28

respondent-State expressed no objection for the same.

¶29

3. Permission is accorded.

¶30

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law.

¶31

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶32

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶33

Date: 11.09.2026 PSA

¶34

¶35

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶36

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11529 of 2025

¶37

Date: 11.09.2026

¶38

PSA

Koribilli Nani Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Koribilli Nani Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases