Dismissed¶46

Kadali Kalyani, W/o.Chittbabu v. Kadali Chitti Babu

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Feb 2026CMA/809/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati — CMA No. 809/2010 — decided 16.02.2026 (Tilhari & Medamalli, JJ.) — wife-appellant's appeal against order/decree dated 10.09.2007 in O.P.No.18 of 2005 (Senior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District) allowing husband's restitution of conjugal rights petition under Section 9, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Lok Adalat settlement failed (both parties absent) — appellant unrepresented — appeal dismissed for want of prosecution — pending miscellaneous petitions closed — no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶46

Kadali Kalyani, W/o.Chittbabu Vs Kadali… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

(RNT,J &BM,J CMA. NO.809 OF 2010)

¶3

[3572]

¶4

APHC010485242010

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶6

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶7

MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶10

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶11

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 809/2010

¶12

Between:

¶13

KADALI KALYANI, W/O.CHITTBABU, D/O.V.VENKATA REDDY R/O.D.NO.4-3-17, MRK PURAM, ANAPARTHI [V] & [M], EAST GOIDAVARI DISTRICT.

¶14

...APPELLANT

¶15

AND

¶16

KADALI CHITTI BABU, S/o.Ramachandra Rao, Hindu R/o.r.Yenugupalli Village, P.Gannavaram Mandal.

¶17

...RESPONDENT

¶18

Appeal Under Section_____against orders

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 1911 OF 2010

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 924 days in representing CMASR No.2328/2008 on the file of thois Hon'ble Court in the interests of justice

¶21

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶22

1.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶24

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

¶27

(RNT,J &BM,J CMA. NO.809 OF 2010)

¶28

JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

¶29

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife, challenging the order and decree dated 10.09.2007 passed in O.P.No.18 of 2005 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District, whereby the respondent/husband’s petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was allowed.

¶30