Dismissed¶41

Yandru Sridhar v. Yandru Vennela

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Apr 2026CMA/448/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Yandru Sridhar (husband, appellant) v. Yandru Vennela (wife, respondent); C.M.A. No. 448 of 2011 (APHC010511752011); High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Ravi Nath Tilhari J (author) and Balaji Medamalli J; decided 16.04.2026. Appeal against decree dated 15.10.2009 in O.P.No.84 of 2008, III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, dismissing husband's divorce petition under Section 13(1a)(1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Dismissed for want of prosecution — none appeared; 2011 'old matters'; Section 151 CPC petitions (condone 438-day delay, CMASR.No. 43803/2009; expedite hearing; substituted service by paper publication) closed; no costs.

What did the court decide?

None; the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, were directed to stand closed.

Yandru Sridhar Vs Yandru Vennela — Matrimonial and Divorce | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010511752011

¶2

[3572]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSD A Y, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRI L TW O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶7

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 448/2011

¶8

Between:

¶9

YANDRU SRIDH A R, S/O. VENKATAPATHI CULTI V ATION, R/O. RANGAMPET VILL A GE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAV A RI DISTRICT.

¶10

...APPELLANT

¶11

AND

¶12

YANDRU VENNEL A , W/o. Yandru Sridhar Housewife R/ o . D.No. 5-124, Yendruvari Street, G. Medapadu, Samalkot Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶13

...RESPONDENT

¶14

Appeal Under Secti o n_____against orders

¶15

IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 371 OF 2011

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circu m stances stated in the affidavit filed in su p port of the petition, the High Court m a y be pleased to condone the delay of 438 days in representing the above CMASR.No. 43803/2009

¶17

IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 658 OF 2012

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circu m stances stated in the affidavit filed in su p port of the petition, the High Court m a y be pleased to expedite the hearing of t h e Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4 4 8/2011 by fixing an early date and pass

¶19

¶20

RNT,J & BM,J C.M.A.No.448 of 2011

¶21

IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1351 OF 2012

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to serve the appeal summons to the respondent by way of substituted service of paper publication

¶23

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶24

1.SRICHARAN TELAPROLU

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶26

¶27

¶28

RNT,J & BM,J C.M.A.No.448 of 2011

¶29

The Court made the following:

¶30

JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

¶31

This appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband, being aggrieved

¶32

from the judgment and decree dated 15.10.2009 passed in O.P.No.84 of

¶33

2008 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada.

¶34

On 17.02.2026, the following order was passed:

¶35

“ The husband is the appellant. His petition seeking

¶36

divorce under Section 13(1a)(1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, was dismissed.

¶37

2. Sri Sricharan Telaprolu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, prays for time to obtain latest instructions, as the matter has been listed after long.

¶38

3. List after four weeks .”

¶39