Sure Ramakrishna Sai Kumar v. Kritika Shukla

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CC/958/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Contempts Case No. 958/2026, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, adjudicated a petition under Sections 10-12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed against Joint Collector Kritika Shukla for alleged disobedience of orders dated 21.03.2025 in W.P. No. 14282 of 2024. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the respondent had complied with the impugned orders, rendering no further punishment necessary. The court accepted this submission.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed. No costs awarded.

Sure Ramakrishna Sai Kumar Vs Kritika Shukla — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010062622026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3459]

¶5

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 958/2026

¶9

Between:

¶10

SURE RAMAKRISHNA SAI KUMAR, S/O. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, (LEASE OWNER OF SRI NIDHI RICE AND INDUSTRIES RICE MILL) R/O. GONUGUNTALIVARIPALEM, H/O. PEDAKANCHERLA VILLAGE, VINUKONDA MANDAL, NOW PALNADU DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

KRITIKA SHUKLA, The Joint Collector, Palnadu, Palnadu District.

¶14

...CONTEMNOR

¶15

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.NO. 14282 OF 2024, dated 21-03-2025 passed by Hon'ble Single Judge and pass

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶17

1.YANAGUNURU SHASHANK

¶18

Counsel for the Contemnor:

¶19

1.VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU

¶20

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER:

¶22

This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 21.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 14282 of 2024.

¶23

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.

¶24

Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed, accordingly. No costs.

¶25

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.

¶26

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

Date: 11.09.2026 rsd

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶31

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 958/2026

¶32

Date: 11.09.2026 rsd

Sure Ramakrishna Sai Kumar v. Kritika Shukla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sure Ramakrishna Sai Kumar v. Kritika Shukla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases