Contempt petition closed after petitioner's counsel stated that court orders in WP.No. 17290 of 2025 had been complied with. No costs awarded.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010101722026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 874/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
2
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue notices to the Respondents herein and punish the respondents under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 02-09-2025 in WP.No. 17290 of 2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER :
Sri. T. Ashok Srivastava Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date: 11.09.2026
Gss
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Sudarshan Reddy
G Sai Prasad
Sri Peeyush Kumar
Vara Prasad
Kabir Basha Shaik
C Prathap
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
