Disposed

Sri P Sudarhsan Reddy v. Sri G Sai Prasad

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CC/81/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The contempt petition was filed for alleged willful violation of High Court orders dated 02-09-2025. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the orders had been complied with and requested closure of the contempt case. The court recorded the submission and closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, also closed.

Sri P Sudarhsan Reddy Vs Sri G Sai Prasad — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

[3333]

APHC010004702026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶5

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶9

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 81/2026

¶10

Between:

¶11

SRI P SUDARHSAN REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. P.SANKARA REDDY, D.NO.6-46-1, R/O. GOYINDAPALLE VILLAGE, SIRIVELLA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRIET.

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

SRI G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION AND CAD, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶15

SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶16

SRI VARA PRASAD, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, SRINIVASA NAGAR, SAROJINI DEVI LAYOUT, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH -517507.

¶17

SRI KABIR BASHA SHAIK, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (PROJECTS) WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL.

¶18

C PRATHAP, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, NANDYAL,

¶19

¶20

KURNOOL DISTRICT.

¶21

SRI MURALI KRISHNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, T.G.P DIVISION, ALLAGADDA, NANDYAL DISTRICT.

¶22

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶23

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 02-09-2025 in WP.No. 17288 of 2025 and pass

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA

¶26

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶27

1.SOMA RAJU YELISETTI

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

¶30

ORDER :

¶31

Sri. T. Ashok Srivastava Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner

¶32

submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and

¶33

requested this Court to close the contempt case

¶34

Recording the same, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶36

___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶37

Date: 11.09.2026

¶38

Gss

Sri P Sudarhsan Reddy v. Sri G Sai Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri P Sudarhsan Reddy v. Sri G Sai Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases