Disposed¶26

Nissankararao Chittibabu v. Vijaya Krishnan,I.a.S

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Sections 10 to 12

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Feb 2026CC/790/2023

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC010045222023 [3208]; Contempt Case No. 790 of 2023, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction), decided 10.02.2026 by Justice D. Ramesh. Nissankararao Chittibabu v. Vijaya Krishnan IAS (District Collector, Bapatla), Smt P Sarojini (Revenue Divisional Officer, Chirala) and Sri J Prabhakar (Tahsildar, Chirala). Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging violation of orders in WP No. 18911 of 2022 dated 20.07.2022; closed on submission of compliance, no costs. Counsel: Balaji Medamalli and Ms. Sudeepthi Potluri for petitioner; P Subash for contemnors.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed. ¶26

Nissankararao Chittibabu Vs Vijaya Krishnan,I.a.S — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010045222023

¶2

[3208]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 790/2023

¶9

Between:

¶10

NISSANKARARAO CHITTIBABU, S/O N. PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O EWS NO.747, ROAD NO.3, KPHB COLONY, HYDERABAD.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

VIJAYA KRISHNAN I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA.

¶14

SMT P SAROJINI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFICER, CHIRALA REVENUE DIVISION. CHIRALA. BAPATLA DISTRICT.

¶15

SRI J PRABHAKAR, TAHSILDAR, CHIRALA MANDAL, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT.

¶16

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶17

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the contemnors and punish them for their wilful and deliberate violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble court in WP No. 18911 of 2022, dated 20.07.2022 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶19

1.BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶20

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶21

1.P SUBASH

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Heard both the learned counsel.

¶25

When the matter is taken up, Ms.Sudeepthi Potluri, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.

¶26

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶28

________________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

¶29

Date: 10.02.2026 M K K

¶30

211

¶31

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH