The petitioner's counsel submitted that the orders dated 12.11.2025 in W.P.No.31379/2025 had been complied with, rendering further contempt proceedings unnecessary. The court recorded the submission and closed the contempt case without costs.
Contempt case closed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3457]
APHC010044312026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 586/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt12.11.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No.31379/2025
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.586 OF 2026
ORDER:
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date: 18.09.2026 KGM
161
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE No.586 of 2026 Date: 18.09.2026
KGM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should continue after the petitioner's counsel stated that the underlying court orders have been complied with.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S.TANGELLA RAMULU, S/O. T.JAGGA RAO
SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
