The contempt case was closed after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the High Court's orders dated 12.11.2025 in WP No.31356/2025 had been complied with, leaving nothing further for consideration. No costs were awarded.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010060452026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT
[3457]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 568/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt12.11.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.31356/2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.568 OF 2026
ORDER:
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date: 18.09.2026 KGM
157
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE No.568 of 2026 Date: 18.09.2026
KGM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should proceed after the underlying court orders have been complied with
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S.TANGELLA RAMULU, S/O. T.JAGGA RAO, AGE. 67 YEARS, D.NO.16-23-37/4B1,AYODHYA NAGAR, ROAD NO.3,KAKINADA,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION , KAKINADA DISTRICT.533001
SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522238
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
