Dismissed

S Sahadeva Reddy v. Peyush Kumar

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CC/445/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a contempt case (C.C. No. 445/2026) where the petitioner complained of a violation of orders dated 09.10.2025. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents had duly complied with the court's orders. Finding no further issues, the court closed the case with no order as to costs and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

S Sahadeva Reddy Vs Peyush Kumar — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

HN, J

C.C.No.445_2026

APHC010006862026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶6

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶7

[3457]

¶8

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶9

PRESENT

¶10

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶11

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 445/2026

¶12

Between:

¶13

S SAHADEVA REDDY, S/O. S KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR CLASS-H, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1/4367/2, MARUTI NAGAR, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

¶14

...PETITIONER

¶15

AND

¶16

PEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶17

SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

¶18

SRI P BHAVANI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT, 516001, (PRESENTLY WORKING AS COMMISSIONER) R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 17.07.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2026 IN CC NO445 OF 2026.

¶19

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶20

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for violation of the orders, dated 09.10.2025 made in W.P.No.27777of 2025 and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

HN, J

C.C.No.445_2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to permit me to bring the proposed respondent No.3 as respondent No.3 in the con tempt case and pass

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶27

1.PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY

¶28

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶29

1.NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

¶30

2.M DELHI BABU

HN, J

C.C.No.445_2026

ORDER:

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.

¶36

In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.

¶37

Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶38

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶40

Date:11.09.2026 NKA

HN, J

115

C.C.No.445_2026

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶46

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 445 of 2026

¶47

Date: 11.09.2026

¶48

NKA

S Sahadeva Reddy v. Peyush Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S Sahadeva Reddy v. Peyush Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases