Disposed

Surya Infrastructures Kakinada v. S Suresh Kumar

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Sept 2026CC/4073/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition filed for alleged willful violation of High Court orders in WP No. 30940/2024 dated 24/07/2025. Petitioner's counsel submitted that the orders have been complied with, and the court closed the contempt case along with any pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.

Surya Infrastructures Kakinada Vs S Suresh Kumar — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3457]

¶2

APHC010688352025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

FRIDAY, THE 18^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4073/2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

SURYA INFRASTRUCTURES KAKINADA, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER AND CONTRACTOR ,YALLA SURYA CHAKRAVARTHI S/O YALLAVENKATA RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/OYALLAVARISTREET, CINEMA ROAD, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DIST.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

S SURESH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI.

¶14

SRI SHAN MOLHAN SAGILI, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA.

¶15

SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KAKINADAMUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA TOWN, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

¶16

SRI S MATSYA RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT

¶17

SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF

¶18

ANDHRA PRADESH FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

¶19

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶20

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue summons under section 10 to 12, 15 and 16 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willfull violation of orders of this Hon'ble court made in WP No 30940 of 2024 dt 24/07/2025 and pass

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶22

1.BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA

¶23

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶24

1.M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations

¶25

2.SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI

¶26

¶27

The Court made the following order:

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court

¶29

have been complied with.

¶30

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

¶31

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

____________________

¶33

JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶34

18.09.2026 RJS/GCD

¶35

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶36

C.C.NO:4073 of 2025

¶37

Dt: 18.09.2026

¶38

RJS/GCD

Surya Infrastructures Kakinada v. S Suresh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surya Infrastructures Kakinada v. S Suresh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases