Petitioner filed a contempt case for violation of WP No.20723/2025 order. Counsel submitted the order was complied with. Court closed the case without orders as to costs.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3457]
APHC010655092025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3830/2025
Between:
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to May be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt.07.08.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.20723/2025 and pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner:
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3830 OF 2025
ORDER:
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date: 15.09.2026 KGM
8
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE No.3830 of 2025 Date: 15.09.2026
KGM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be punished for violation of a previous court order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.SATYANARAYANA
M/S N V V SATYANARAYANA
SRI S MASTYARAJU
SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR
HARINATH.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
