Disposed

M/S.Bhavani Constructions v. Sri N.V.V Satyanarayana

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Sept 2026CC/3498/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed a contempt case after the petitioner's counsel stated that the court's earlier orders had been complied with. The contempt petition had been filed alleging wilful violation of an order dated 16.07.2025 in WP No. 5611/2025. All pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed as a consequence.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed; all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.

M/S.Bhavani Constructions Vs Sri N.V.V Satyanarayana — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3457]

¶2

APHC010613862025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE 16^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3498/2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

M/S.BHAVANI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER,NAGAM KONDALA RAO S/O.N.CHINNA VEERRAJU , AGE 55 YEARS, R/O.21-01-5/3,PYDA VARI STREET SALI PETA , KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT.R 1 CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27.02.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2025 IN CC NO 3498 OF 2025

¶14

SRI S MASTYARAJU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

¶15

SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.

¶16

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶17

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 16.07.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.5611/2025 and pass such

¶18

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Amend the Cause Title in the present Contempt case by Deleting the Respondent No. 1. Sri Sachidandha varma. Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District and Amend Respondent 1 as Sri N V V Satyanarayana, Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada in the above C.C.No.3498 of 2025 and to pass

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA

¶22

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶23

1.M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations

¶24

The Court made the following order:

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court

¶26

have been complied with.

¶27

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

¶28

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶29

____________________

¶30

JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶31

16.09.2026 RJS/GCD

¶32

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶33

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3498/2025

¶34

Dt: 16.09.2026

¶35

RJS/GCD

M/S.Bhavani Constructions v. Sri N.V.V Satyanarayana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Bhavani Constructions v. Sri N.V.V Satyanarayana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases