The petitioner, who passed away in 2019, filed a contempt case alleging the respondent as the contemnor. The Court allowed the submission that the cause of action did not survive due to the petitioner's death, thereby closing the case.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010148162012
Bench Sr.No:-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 90 AT AMARAVATI
[3506]
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 345 of 2012
S.V.Raghava Charyulu ...Petitioner
Vs.
Mr K Balaraju
...Contemnor
CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 11th September 2026
Present:
Advocate for Petitioner: MR.MARUTI RAO SRUNGARAPU Advocate(s) for Contemnor(s): . ELEVATED AS JUDGE ***
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner passed
away in the year 2019 itself, therefore, cause in the Contempt Case does not survive.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
cs
S.V.Raghava Charyulu
Mr K Balaraju
CHALLA GUNARANJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
