T VIJAYA KUMAR, S / O. T NARASIMHA RAOMALE, AGED A BOUT 40 YEARS ,OCC CON T RACTOR, R/O. D. NO. 2-132A,GOV E RNMENT HOSPITAL BACKSID E , KAIKALURU ,KRISHNA DISTRICT

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PE T ITIONER, AGED MAJOR, O CC PRINCIPAL SECRETAR Y FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VEL A GAPUDI, AMARAVATI - 522 238

¶15

SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, IAS S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, A G ED MAJOR,OCC SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARYPANCH A YAT RAJ RURAL DEVE L OPMENT DEPARTMENT,SEC R ETARIAT BUILDINGS, VEL A GAPUDI, AMARAVATI - 522 238

¶16

K VETRI SELVI, IAS D /O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITION E R, AGED MAJOR,OCC DIST R ICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT JALA BHAVAN, COLLECTORATE COMPOUND ELURU, ANDHRAPRADESH- 5 34 006

¶17

RAMMAN, S/O. N O T KNOWN TO THE PETITIONE R , AGED MAJOR,OCC EXEC U TIVE ENGINEER, PR PIU DIVISION JALA BHAVAN, COLLE C TORATE COMPOUND ELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534 00

¶18

RC,J C.C.No.3188 of 2026

¶19

¶20

VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR,OCC DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR SUBDIVISION MANDAVALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT JALA BHAVAN, COLLECTORATE COMPOUND ELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534 006

¶21

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶22

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to Summon the Respondents/Contemnors for willfully violating and displaying gross negligence in implementing the Final Order dt. 24.11.2025 in W.P No 29995 of 2025 passed by this Honble Court and punish them as per law in the interest of justice and to pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.PEDDIBHOTLA VENKATA SAI RAJESH

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Sri G.John Deva Sundar, learned counsel, representing Sri P.V.Sai Rajesh, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and hence nothing remains for adjudication and the same may be closed.

¶27

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for parties, this

¶28

Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶30

__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶31

11^TH September, 2026

¶32

T Vijaya Kumar v. Peeyush Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

T Vijaya Kumar v. Peeyush Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases