Disposed¶32

K.C.Murali v. K Ananda Reddy

Andhra Pradesh HC26 Apr 2026CC/3156/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AP HC Amaravati (Ravi Cheemalapati J.), C.C.No.3156/2025, order dt. 27.04.2026: contempt under Ss.10-12, Contempt of Courts Act 1971 by K.C. Murali & others over alleged non-compliance with orders in W.P.No.41562 of 2022 (dt. 13.09.2024 per order; 30-09-2024 per petition) against Sub Registrar, Renigunta; K. Balaji impleaded as 2nd contemnor via I.A.No.1/2026 (S.151 CPC) order dt. 20.04.2026; petitioner's counsel reported compliance; contempt closed, no costs; misc. applications closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed on recordal of counsel's submission of compliance; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed. ¶32

K.C.Murali Vs K Ananda Reddy — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010573102025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3332]

¶5

MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3156/2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

K.C.MURALI, S/O LATE K.C.RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-1-16, R.S.GARDENS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

¶11

K.C.ANUSHA, D/O K.C.MURALI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-1-16, R.S.GARDENS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

¶12

K.C.NISHA, D/O K.C.MURALI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-1-16, R.S.GARDENS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT

¶13

...PETITIONER(S)

¶14

AND

¶15

K ANANDA REDDY, SUB REGISTRAR, RENIGUNTA TIRUPATI DISTRICT

¶16

SRI K BALAJI, SUB REGISTRAR, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 20.04.2026 VIDE IA NO-1/2026 INCC NO-3156 OF 2025

¶17

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶18

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call for the Respondents/Contemnors and punish them under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, for

¶19

¶20

intentionally, wantonly, and Deliberately not complying the orders passed by this Honble Court dated 30-09-2024 in WP 41562/2022 and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed Respondent No.2 as Respondent/Contemnor No. 2 in C.C.No.3156/2025 and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶24

1.SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI

¶25

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶26

1.J DILEEP KUMAR

¶27

The Court made the following:

¶28

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 13.09.2024 passed in W.P.No.41562 of 2022.

¶31

Sri Subba Rai Korrapati, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt.

¶32

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶34

_____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶35

Date: 27^th April, 2026 RKS

K.C.Murali v. K Ananda Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.C.Murali v. K Ananda Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukkamala Venkata Vijaya Lakshmi Vs Sree Kaleswari Travels

M Prabhakar Vs the State of Ap

Mukkamala Venkata Vijaya Lakshmi Vs Sree Kaleswari Travels

S Shaikshavali Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Kunche Venkata Lakshmi Vs Pinepe Malamma

Vangara Nagaraju Vs the State of Ap