The High Court closed contempt proceedings after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the court's orders in WP No. 22685 of 2024 had been complied with.
Contempt case closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010517832025
[3333]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3100/2025
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
2
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, deliberately, violating and not implementing the orders of the Honble High Court passed in WP. No. 22685 of 2024, Dt. 13.02.2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER :
Sri. Dasari S.V.V.S.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date: 11.09.2026
Gss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should be closed in view of compliance with the High Court's orders.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C Hanumantha Reddy
Sri S Suresh Kumar IAS
Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS
Sri Dr P Sampath Kumar IAS
M Sai Krishna
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
