Disposed

Vattem Srinivasa Rao v. Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CC/2926/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single line order closing a contempt case. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the respondents had duly complied with prior orders. Consequently, the court recorded this submission and closed the contempt proceedings with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions to stand closed.

Vattem Srinivasa Rao Vs Sri… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

HN, J

C.C.No.2926_2025

APHC010539442025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶6

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶7

[3457]

¶8

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶9

PRESENT

¶10

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2926/2025

¶11

Between:

¶12

VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. 36-85, PURUSHOTHAMA PATNAM, CHILAKALURIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶13

...PETITIONER

¶14

AND

¶15

SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R-2)

¶16

SRI P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R3)

¶17

SRI P SRIHARI BABU, COMMISSIONER, CHILAKALURIPET MUNICIPALITY CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. (R-4)

¶18

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶19

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 12-082025 passed in WP.No. 15700 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the contempt of Courts act and to pass

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA

¶22

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶23

1.SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI

¶24

2.SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI

HN, J

C.C.No.2926_2025

ORDER:

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents.

¶30

In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.

¶31

Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶33

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶34

Date:11.09.2026 NKA

HN, J

120

C.C.No.2926_2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶40

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2926 of 2025

¶41

Date: 11.09.2026

¶42

NKA

Vattem Srinivasa Rao v. Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vattem Srinivasa Rao v. Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases