The contempt case was closed after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the respondents had complied with the underlying writ court order directing payment of an admitted amount.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010337692026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2382 OF 2026
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may
2
be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents by invoking the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps in accordance with law, for willful, wanton, and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 19.11.2025 in W.P. No. 23355 of 2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner: M SHANMUKHA TEJA
Counsel for the Respondents: NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents:SOMA RAJU YELISETTI Counsel for the Respondents:T S RAYALU
3
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.23355 of 2025 on 19.11.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order:
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 KGR
__________________
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited
Shashibhushan Kumar
Peeyush Kumar
B Bala Chandra Reddy
U Ramesh
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
