Disposed

Sri Rama Construction v. Sri G Sai Prasad

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CC/2338/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A contempt petition was filed alleging willful disobedience of a High Court order directing payment to the petitioner contractor. At the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the order had been complied with, and requested closure of the contempt case. The court recorded the submission and closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.

Sri Rama Construction Vs Sri G Sai Prasad — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010332572026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2338 OF 2026

¶7

Between:

¶8

SRI RAMA CONSTRUCTION, Prop Venkata Gopi Pinapatruni S/o Raja rao aged about 45 years, R/o H No 1-343/2, Padabodepalle village, Narsipatnam mandal, Anakapalli District..

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

SRI G SAI PRASAD, Father name not known to the petitioner. The PrI Secretary Irrigation and Water Resources (CAD) Department, State of Andhra Pradesh at Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P. -522237

¶12

Sri Peeyush Kumar, Father name not known to the petitioner. The PrI Secretary Finance department. State of Andhra Pradesh at Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P.-522237

¶13

Dr Mahes Kumar ravirala I A S, District collector, dr B R Ambedkar Konaseema District. Ramachandra puram, -533255

¶14

G Srinivas Rao, The superintending Engineer Irrigation and water Resources dept. Irrigation Circle Dowleswararam East Godavari District533125

¶15

V V Rama krishna, Executive Engineer, Irrigation and water Resources, dept Godavari Eastern Division,Ramachandrapuram Dr B R Amedkar Konaseema District -533255

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for violating the Orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P. No32684 OF 2025 dated 09.12.2025 in the interest of Justice and pass

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: CH B R P SEKHAR

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents:SOMA RAJU YELISETTI Counsel for the Respondents:T S RAYALU

¶20

The Court made the following

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.32684 of 2025 on 09.12.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order:

¶23

“….this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificates dated 07.10.2024 issued by the respondents within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.....…”

¶24

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Shaik Sardar Hussain, learned counsel representing Mr.Ch.B.R.P. Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 09.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.32684 of 2025 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case.

¶25

Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶26

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

¶27

Date: 11.09.2026 KGR

¶28

__________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

Sri Rama Construction v. Sri G Sai Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Rama Construction v. Sri G Sai Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases