Contempt case closed after counsel stated the court's order in the underlying writ petition had been complied with by the respondents. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications for recall of bailable warrants also closed.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications for recall of bailable warrants closed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3330]
APHC010327772026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2280/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedient of not taking the action as per the orders of the Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 8923 of 2023, dated 26-11-2023 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
2
may be pleased to Recall the Bailable Warrant issued on 31.07.2026 against the Respondent No. 1 in C.C.No.2280/2026 and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Recall the Bailable Warrant issued on 31.07.2026 . against the Respondent No. 2 in C.C.No.2280/2026 and pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Recall the Bailable Warrant issued on 31.07.2026 against the Respondent No.. 3 in C.C.No.2280/2026 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2280 of 2026
ORDER:
Sri N.C.John Paul, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents.
Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Date: 15.09.2026 KBN
4
30
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.2280 of 2026
15.09.2026 KBN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents wilfully disobeyed the court's order in W.P. No. 8923 of 2023 dated 26-11-2023
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Swarnalatha @ Sunitha
S Venkatesar, The District Collector, Tirupati District
Sri Bhanu Prakash Bhanu Prakash Reddy, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikalahasthi, Tirupati District
T Venkata Subramanyam, Srikalahasthi Mandal, Tirupati District
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
