G.Raveen Kumar, v. Smt.Y.v.Anuradha

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Mar 2026CC/2239/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; Contempt Case 2239/2018; Justice Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda; decided 10.03.2026; contempt of court; Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Sections 10-12; wilful disobedience of interim orders dated 07.08.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.27781 of 2018; Endowments Department Commissioner; Srisailam Devasthanam Executive Officer; contempt case closed without punishment; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed on counsel's recorded submission, without punishment of the respondents and with no order as to costs; pending Miscellaneous Petitions in the contempt case directed to stand closed. ¶¶31

G.Raveen Kumar, Vs Smt.Y.v.Anuradha — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3329]

¶2

APHC010625002018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2239/2018

¶7

Between:

¶8

G.RAVEEN KUMAR,, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.14-1-458, 3RD FLOOR AGHAPURA, HYDERABAD 1.

¶9

G.S.MALLIKARJUN,, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.14-1-458, 3RD FLOOR AGHAPURA, HYDERABAD 1.

¶10

...PETITIONER(S)

¶11

AND

¶12

SMT Y V ANURADHA, W/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE COMMISSIONER OF ANDHRA PRADESH ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT TILAK ROAD, BOGGULAKUNTA HYDERABAD.

¶13

SRI RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRISAILAM DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶14

N JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, OCC PRESIDENT SRI SHAMABASAWESHWARA SADASIVAIAH VEERASAIVA ANNA SATRAM SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P.

¶15

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶16

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for willful disobedience and utter disregard of the Orders passed by this Hon'ble High

¶17

¶18

Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.27781 of 2018 dated 07.08.2018, and pass

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶20

1.M NATRAJ SINGH

¶21

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶22

1.P RAJANI REDDY

¶23

2.M VIDYASAGAR

¶24

3.A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS)

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

¶27

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2239/2018

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 07.08.2018 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.27781 of 2018.

¶30

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Y.Bhanu Sri Akhila, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of disposal of the Writ Petition, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.

¶31

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.

¶32

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.

¶33

________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J

10.03.2026 TPS

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA